Sex Offenders: To Castrate or Not To Castrate

     The act of rape is considered one of the worst crimes that can happen to other people. In recent years, there has been much debate about whether sex offenders should undergo voluntary surgery or compulsory treatment. There are many arguments about and against the chemistry or Castration used against known sex offenders.
     First and foremost, it is essential to explain the difference between surgery and chemical castration. Episodic surgery is the removal of a human testicle for the purpose of removing his reproductive ability and to control the level of testosterone produced. It is suspected that the outcome of surgery is to completely eradicate sexual desire because the adrenal glands in the kidneys also produce testosterone and may cause males to have sexual desire. The method is now debatable because it cannot be reversed. However, the effect may be overturned by the injection of testosterone, which can be obtained on the road, allowing sex offenders to be punished with criminal and lust. The chemistry also has an effect. But it involves the injection of antiandrogen to reduce testosterone levels. The injection is a synthetic progestin, which tells the brain to stop the hormones that stimulate the testicles to produce testosterone. They work by tricking the brain into believing that the body has enough hormones, so the body stops producing. As a result, the testosterone level in a human body decreases and his sexual desire decreases. Unlike surgery, surgery is a complete opposite. The injection remains in the bloodstream for six to eight weeks. But the effect will decrease rapidly after injection. As with any medication, the doer must have the correct dosage for the injection to be effective. Although the Castration of the chemical is not as polished and permanent as the surgical procedure But it has also been heavily criticized as a possible treatment for sex offenders (Harrison, 2007).
     Although both forms of Castration are seen as barbarians But there are some arguments The most obvious thing is that the level of sexual desire of a sex offender decreases. The literature shows low testosterone levels and allows offenders to feel more relaxed and sluggish, which helps them to better control violence and aggression. This will help the sex offenders in the process become members of society (Carpenter, 1998). Another advantage of Castration, which is supported by extensive research, shows that including Castration with other types of treatment greatly reduces the risk of relapse. One research studies the rate of recidivism among twenty-four men. All have included episodes of chemicals and other forms of treatment. Of the twenty-four men who started the study, only one participant committed serious sexual offenses in two and a half years. The crime occurred after the participants withdrew from all forms of treatment. (Rice and Harris 2011) Another argument that supports the Castration of sex offenders is that the judicial system must consider giving priority to the victim before the rights of the offender. Not abandoning the offender due to moral reasons is a weak argument. The victims will be affected by the crimes committed against them for the rest of their lives. Therefore, the punishment should be made as appropriate and will affect the offender throughout the life as well. Although Castration does not prevent other sex crimes from 100% uncertainty, it is still better than no treatment at all.
     Although there are many reasons why sexual offenders should be castrated. But there are many arguments as well One of the main reasons why people argue that punishment in the form of punishment is because it violates the rights of the offender. People believe it is a violation of the rights of cruel and unusual punishment, freedom of reproduction, and the right to have a proper relationship between crime and punishment (Miller, 1998). This argument is hard to argue, which may be the reason. Why some people resist the Castration of sex offenders The exact nature of this type of punishment is incompatible with these important principles. Another aspect of the controversy that needs to be considered is what will happen if the offender later acquits him. Epidural surgery is a permanent solution and pure offenders will carry unreasonable scars forever guaranteed. One of these factors makes solving this problem difficult to fight for based on this situation. However, the argument against the Castration of sex offenders is the fact that violent sex crimes are not related to sex at all. They deal with the dominance and control of other people (Harrison, 2007). sex crimes are a symptom of a deeper problem. Therefore it is necessary that both the problem and the symptom be resolved if the offender.

Works Cited

Carpenter, A. (1998). "Belgium, Germany, England, Denmark, and the United States: The Implementation of Registration and Castration Laws as Protection Against
Habitual sex Offenders." Dickinson Journal of International Law, 16(2), 435–57.
Harrison, K. (2007). "The High-Risk sex Offender Strategy in England and Wales: Is Chemical Castration an Option?." The Howard Journal, 46(1), 16-31.
Miller, R. (1998). "Forced Administration of sex Drive, Reducing Medications to sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment?." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1), 175-199.
Rice, M., and G. Harris. (2011). "Is Androgen Deprivation Therapy Effective In The Treatment of sex Offenders?." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(2), 315-332.

Premarital Sex And Same Sex Marriages

    From premarital sex to same-sex marriage, society has seen many changes in the last two or three decades as acceptable when it comes to gender and gender. Although the law has changed, Americans still have a high level of variation about what people consider ethical or acceptable when it comes to sexual orientation and gender selection. Greenberg, Bruess, and Oswalt define sexual orientation as " Attracting love or sexual arousal or both sexes "(page 370). Changing attitudes towards premarital sex, extramarital sex / early adolescents, and relationships Health promotion between the same sex will be discussed at this event.
One of the most significant changes in American culture is the acceptance of sex before marriage. For decades, premarital sex is morally unacceptable and is a sexual bias lesson taught between parents and children. Many parents talk to their children when they have sex and give the advice to wait for the particular person they want to be with for the rest of their lives. Over time, this dialogue changed slightly compared to the acceptance of boys who have sex before marriage to girls who are still virgins and not having sex. In addition to moral issues, there are religious aspects of premarital sex. Many Americans have some spiritual beliefs, even if they do not believe in Christian believers or devoted church members. The specific passage from the Bible that tells a person to avoid having sex before marriage is "... It is suitable for a man not to have sex with a woman. But since sexual immorality arose, each man should have sexual relations with his wife and each woman with her husband (1 Corinthians 7: 1-2, the new universal version). Although the Bible has never changed Data from general social surveys of American adults. But it shows that in the last 50 years, there was a 29% increase in premarital sex acceptance (Lucke, 2015). Although premarital sex has seen an increase in recognition, Americans do not sacrifice much. In matters of sexual relations outside of marriage or early adolescents
    With the ever-increasing teen pregnancy rate and young children / young adults beginning pubic sex stages, teenagers at the beginning of their previous ages seem to be a consistently exciting topic. It is interesting to read that not all states have the same age consent law. There are many cases of legal rape in the news in Mississippi. It's shocking to see that the neighboring countries of Louisiana are of different ages. Everyone thinks that a bill is given to determine the age that is equal. In every state to make rapes more easily punished With two states, such as Mississippi and Louisiana, getting closer together, sex hunters want to meet 16-year-old children across the state line, and now they do not commit a crime. The same data that gave a 56 percent approval rating for adult premarital sex showed six percent approval for intercourse between teens between the ages of 14 and 16. Surprisingly, the testimony Accept less than one percent for marital sex out of wedlock 2015). It must be noted that in today's society there are two definitions of sexual relations Scrap for marriage According to the gender unfaithful, the free dictionary is "Sex between unmarried people" (extramarital sex) from the definition of premarital sex and extramarital sexual intercourse seems to be interchangeable, but Merriam-Webster Set gender outside the world to "sexual relations between married people and people other than their spouses" (extramarital) definition Merriam-Webster Will be used for the purpose of this article sexual relations, infidelity, infidelity, infidelity, extramarital affair or whatever in a society that wants to state that it is very low tolerance and not just in America Australian health and relationship studies show that 83 percent of relationships are unacceptable for Australian age groups from 16 to 69 (Lucken, 2015). These changes in American culture are Stand out But the most widely discussed change today is same-sex relationships.
    One of the most controversial debates has become a decision by the US Supreme Court that same-sex marriage is a legal right in the United States. No one knows what they will find around the cold water when this topic occurs. Some people completely oppose it, stating that any country that proclaims it was built on Christian morals and the Bible conflicts with what is written in the Bible. While others fully support the trial compared to the human rights movement that ended slavery and oppression, either due to color or nationality. In the middle, all those who do not believe in homosexuality can compare with the human rights movement. But feel the exclusion of a person because their differences should not be accepted. These conversations increased because of changes in the acceptance of same-sex relationships. According to Jayne Lucke, attitudes towards same-sex couples increased by 44% between 1993 and 2012 (2015). Saw that acceptance of sexual relations increased from 11 percent in 1973 to 42 percent in 2012 (Lucke, 2015) as well as racial discrimination that continues same-sex relationships are not recognized as a completely normal lifestyle. But change shows that American culture understands that acceptance is a true sign of growth, and if America doesn't grow National power plant
    sexual endurance is a constant discussion topic. At home, school, or workers face a certain level of sexual endurance. From changes in military regulations to office issues or teachers who have sex with students Over time, America has become more tolerant of issues of premarital sex and homosexuality. But adhering to the denial of extramarital sex and early adolescents Americans tend to have different opinions about what society is and / or is morally acceptable. But changes in society will see those differences begin to narrow every year.