Saturday 14 March 2020

Sex Offenders: To Castrate or Not To Castrate

     The act of rape is considered one of the worst crimes that can happen to other people. In recent years, there has been much debate about whether sex offenders should undergo voluntary surgery or compulsory treatment. There are many arguments about and against the chemistry or Castration used against known sex offenders.
     First and foremost, it is essential to explain the difference between surgery and chemical castration. Episodic surgery is the removal of a human testicle for the purpose of removing his reproductive ability and to control the level of testosterone produced. It is suspected that the outcome of surgery is to completely eradicate sexual desire because the adrenal glands in the kidneys also produce testosterone and may cause males to have sexual desire. The method is now debatable because it cannot be reversed. However, the effect may be overturned by the injection of testosterone, which can be obtained on the road, allowing sex offenders to be punished with criminal and lust. The chemistry also has an effect. But it involves the injection of antiandrogen to reduce testosterone levels. The injection is a synthetic progestin, which tells the brain to stop the hormones that stimulate the testicles to produce testosterone. They work by tricking the brain into believing that the body has enough hormones, so the body stops producing. As a result, the testosterone level in a human body decreases and his sexual desire decreases. Unlike surgery, surgery is a complete opposite. The injection remains in the bloodstream for six to eight weeks. But the effect will decrease rapidly after injection. As with any medication, the doer must have the correct dosage for the injection to be effective. Although the Castration of the chemical is not as polished and permanent as the surgical procedure But it has also been heavily criticized as a possible treatment for sex offenders (Harrison, 2007).
     Although both forms of Castration are seen as barbarians But there are some arguments The most obvious thing is that the level of sexual desire of a sex offender decreases. The literature shows low testosterone levels and allows offenders to feel more relaxed and sluggish, which helps them to better control violence and aggression. This will help the sex offenders in the process become members of society (Carpenter, 1998). Another advantage of Castration, which is supported by extensive research, shows that including Castration with other types of treatment greatly reduces the risk of relapse. One research studies the rate of recidivism among twenty-four men. All have included episodes of chemicals and other forms of treatment. Of the twenty-four men who started the study, only one participant committed serious sexual offenses in two and a half years. The crime occurred after the participants withdrew from all forms of treatment. (Rice and Harris 2011) Another argument that supports the Castration of sex offenders is that the judicial system must consider giving priority to the victim before the rights of the offender. Not abandoning the offender due to moral reasons is a weak argument. The victims will be affected by the crimes committed against them for the rest of their lives. Therefore, the punishment should be made as appropriate and will affect the offender throughout the life as well. Although Castration does not prevent other sex crimes from 100% uncertainty, it is still better than no treatment at all.
     Although there are many reasons why sexual offenders should be castrated. But there are many arguments as well One of the main reasons why people argue that punishment in the form of punishment is because it violates the rights of the offender. People believe it is a violation of the rights of cruel and unusual punishment, freedom of reproduction, and the right to have a proper relationship between crime and punishment (Miller, 1998). This argument is hard to argue, which may be the reason. Why some people resist the Castration of sex offenders The exact nature of this type of punishment is incompatible with these important principles. Another aspect of the controversy that needs to be considered is what will happen if the offender later acquits him. Epidural surgery is a permanent solution and pure offenders will carry unreasonable scars forever guaranteed. One of these factors makes solving this problem difficult to fight for based on this situation. However, the argument against the Castration of sex offenders is the fact that violent sex crimes are not related to sex at all. They deal with the dominance and control of other people (Harrison, 2007). sex crimes are a symptom of a deeper problem. Therefore it is necessary that both the problem and the symptom be resolved if the offender.

Works Cited

Carpenter, A. (1998). "Belgium, Germany, England, Denmark, and the United States: The Implementation of Registration and Castration Laws as Protection Against
Habitual sex Offenders." Dickinson Journal of International Law, 16(2), 435–57.
Harrison, K. (2007). "The High-Risk sex Offender Strategy in England and Wales: Is Chemical Castration an Option?." The Howard Journal, 46(1), 16-31.
Miller, R. (1998). "Forced Administration of sex Drive, Reducing Medications to sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment?." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1), 175-199.
Rice, M., and G. Harris. (2011). "Is Androgen Deprivation Therapy Effective In The Treatment of sex Offenders?." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(2), 315-332.

Friday 21 February 2020

Sex Education : A Shocking Amount Of Sex

    "Abstinence-Only?" More Like "Accidents-Only" sex ed. A phrase would make most middle schoolers cringe or giggle, and most high school students groan. Whether it was looking at diagrams of reproductive organs, reading about people who regret having sex before marriage, or watching slideshows with pictures of various genitals laden with disease, most sex education seemed disgusting and terrifying to students. Worst of all, much of it was incorrect. In reality, a shocking amount of sex education taught to students is misleading and untrue in many cases. This leads to problems such as STIs, STDs, and teen pregnancy which could possibly be avoided if students had been properly taught how to do so. After conducting a survey on anal sex experience among students in the rural Midwest, Dake et al. write, "A study by Boekeloo and Howard found that 20% of adolescents did not believe that anal intercourse could transmit HIV" (Dake et al. 202). Misconceptions like these can end up causing health problems in students since they never had a chance to learn there was any physical danger caused by their actions.
    Many schools across the country (and even the world) rely on abstinence-only education. "Abstinence-only refers to any sex education which teaches students that sex before marriage should never happen, and if it does, the consequences are terrible. While talking about some sex education lessons taught by public schools, Jennifer Greenblatt, a law clerk, writes, "One curriculum incredulously warns 'touching another person's genitals 'can result in pregnancy'" (12). By teaching false information like this, the government, teachers, and parents believe students won't participate in premarital sex. The flaw in this logic lies in the reality of the situation since many students do have sex before marriage, and when they have sex, they have no idea what can happen and how to be safe.
Schools should teach students about a wide variety of contraceptives, and other ways to avoid disease and pregnancy. For this to happen, the federal government would have to make laws requiring schools to teach a widely inclusive and scientifically true sex education curriculum to students. The reason it would be up to the federal government is that state governments were already given a chance to make laws regarding sex education in schools, which hasn't worked for many states. After considering what teenagers need to know, Giambi et al. states in a summary of Sexual and Relationship Therapy's inaugural debate, "Whatever their gender or orientation, adolescents do need sound information… and opportunities to develop as individuals and independent sexual decision-makers" (486). Everyone should be taught a wide variety of ways to practice safe sex so they can choose how they are going to go about their lives. Whether someone chooses to practice abstinence until marriage or uses birth control pills and condoms should be up to themselves. Many people miss out on that choice because they don't know they had a choice at all and end up accidentally putting their health at risk. If the government were to mandate the teaching of in-depth and correct sex education, states would have no choice but to do so without having to face the consequences. Since more students would learn how to have safe sex, more teen pregnancies and STDs/STIs could be prevented. Arguments against in-depth sex education for students are usually related to the idea that if students learn about sex, they will end up having sex because of it. Many teenagers are going to have sex whether or not they are taught only about abstinence, contraceptives, or nothing at all. The difference sex education makes is how they are going to have sex. Once explaining how some places have begun to move to other forms of sex education rather than abstinence-only, Strasburger and Brown explain the other side, those who have yet to make a change, "States like Oklahoma and Alabama-with 2 of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the country do not require any sex education in school at all" (1). This information shows how sex education helps to prevent teen pregnancy since states, where there is little to no sex education, have higher teen pregnancy rates.
    In order for any change to be made, the federal government would have to make abstinence-only sex education against the law. Public schools would be required by law to teach students about contraceptives and how to use them, ways to avoid STDs and STIs, and how to practice safe sex in general. Because it takes a lot of pressure to change laws and societal norms, people who agree schools need to teach more than abstinence must speak up to make a difference. Something in how sex education is taught must change, so students know how to protect themselves from disease and teen pregnancy.

Thursday 20 February 2020

Premarital Sex And Same Sex Marriages

    From premarital sex to same-sex marriage, society has seen many changes in the last two or three decades as acceptable when it comes to gender and gender. Although the law has changed, Americans still have a high level of variation about what people consider ethical or acceptable when it comes to sexual orientation and gender selection. Greenberg, Bruess, and Oswalt define sexual orientation as " Attracting love or sexual arousal or both sexes "(page 370). Changing attitudes towards premarital sex, extramarital sex / early adolescents, and relationships Health promotion between the same sex will be discussed at this event.
One of the most significant changes in American culture is the acceptance of sex before marriage. For decades, premarital sex is morally unacceptable and is a sexual bias lesson taught between parents and children. Many parents talk to their children when they have sex and give the advice to wait for the particular person they want to be with for the rest of their lives. Over time, this dialogue changed slightly compared to the acceptance of boys who have sex before marriage to girls who are still virgins and not having sex. In addition to moral issues, there are religious aspects of premarital sex. Many Americans have some spiritual beliefs, even if they do not believe in Christian believers or devoted church members. The specific passage from the Bible that tells a person to avoid having sex before marriage is "... It is suitable for a man not to have sex with a woman. But since sexual immorality arose, each man should have sexual relations with his wife and each woman with her husband (1 Corinthians 7: 1-2, the new universal version). Although the Bible has never changed Data from general social surveys of American adults. But it shows that in the last 50 years, there was a 29% increase in premarital sex acceptance (Lucke, 2015). Although premarital sex has seen an increase in recognition, Americans do not sacrifice much. In matters of sexual relations outside of marriage or early adolescents
    With the ever-increasing teen pregnancy rate and young children / young adults beginning pubic sex stages, teenagers at the beginning of their previous ages seem to be a consistently exciting topic. It is interesting to read that not all states have the same age consent law. There are many cases of legal rape in the news in Mississippi. It's shocking to see that the neighboring countries of Louisiana are of different ages. Everyone thinks that a bill is given to determine the age that is equal. In every state to make rapes more easily punished With two states, such as Mississippi and Louisiana, getting closer together, sex hunters want to meet 16-year-old children across the state line, and now they do not commit a crime. The same data that gave a 56 percent approval rating for adult premarital sex showed six percent approval for intercourse between teens between the ages of 14 and 16. Surprisingly, the testimony Accept less than one percent for marital sex out of wedlock 2015). It must be noted that in today's society there are two definitions of sexual relations Scrap for marriage According to the gender unfaithful, the free dictionary is "Sex between unmarried people" (extramarital sex) from the definition of premarital sex and extramarital sexual intercourse seems to be interchangeable, but Merriam-Webster Set gender outside the world to "sexual relations between married people and people other than their spouses" (extramarital) definition Merriam-Webster Will be used for the purpose of this article sexual relations, infidelity, infidelity, infidelity, extramarital affair or whatever in a society that wants to state that it is very low tolerance and not just in America Australian health and relationship studies show that 83 percent of relationships are unacceptable for Australian age groups from 16 to 69 (Lucken, 2015). These changes in American culture are Stand out But the most widely discussed change today is same-sex relationships.
    One of the most controversial debates has become a decision by the US Supreme Court that same-sex marriage is a legal right in the United States. No one knows what they will find around the cold water when this topic occurs. Some people completely oppose it, stating that any country that proclaims it was built on Christian morals and the Bible conflicts with what is written in the Bible. While others fully support the trial compared to the human rights movement that ended slavery and oppression, either due to color or nationality. In the middle, all those who do not believe in homosexuality can compare with the human rights movement. But feel the exclusion of a person because their differences should not be accepted. These conversations increased because of changes in the acceptance of same-sex relationships. According to Jayne Lucke, attitudes towards same-sex couples increased by 44% between 1993 and 2012 (2015). Saw that acceptance of sexual relations increased from 11 percent in 1973 to 42 percent in 2012 (Lucke, 2015) as well as racial discrimination that continues same-sex relationships are not recognized as a completely normal lifestyle. But change shows that American culture understands that acceptance is a true sign of growth, and if America doesn't grow National power plant
    sexual endurance is a constant discussion topic. At home, school, or workers face a certain level of sexual endurance. From changes in military regulations to office issues or teachers who have sex with students Over time, America has become more tolerant of issues of premarital sex and homosexuality. But adhering to the denial of extramarital sex and early adolescents Americans tend to have different opinions about what society is and / or is morally acceptable. But changes in society will see those differences begin to narrow every year.

Wednesday 19 February 2020

Sex Education versus Abstinence

    Students in the United States should go to a sex education class that promotes smoking cessation instead of being safe. Why is sex education more prominent than quitting? Focusing on stopping will lead to better results in life, while sex education has significant disadvantages. Quitting smoking is the way to go because the safest sex is sex.
According to the Macmillan Dictionary, sex education is a system of preventive measures and instruction for implantation in parents, children, adolescents, and young adults, the correct attitude towards sex. In the state of Mississippi, one requirement for graduation is attending health classes that teach students about the dangers of sex. sex education classes should teach us how to live a safe sex life outside of marriage. While abstaining is voluntary, especially the release of sex, Webster-Merriam, although our school, will declare safe sex. But those classes do not reduce pregnancy in all of our schools. In the face of the lack of teaching students how to use condoms correctly, it is one of the reasons that the school promotes safe abstinence.
    Teaching students about safe sex lives is wrong, if not all, religions. Catholics and Christians frown upon the teachings of sex with their children. They feel that there is sex for married couples and should not be mentioned outside of their lover's bedroom. Some religions find it a sin to talk about sex in public. First Corinthians 7: 9 "If they cannot control themselves, they should marry because it is better to burn with love." Marriage Gives us the opportunity to fulfill those desires without fault in a satisfactory and respectful way to God (Speck: Sex is worth the wait). Sex is a beautiful activity in With the eyes of God, and where the best places to enjoy marriage. Sexual relationships with your spouse or wife are a time for rejoicing, laughter, encouragement, fun, and unity (point), and teenagers whose parents have strong religious beliefs can confuse school.
One disadvantage of sex education is the fact that parents want to be the ones who teach their children about sex. They may have different ways in which teachers can enter and motivate students to misunderstand information or, in some cases, too bluff, which may cause confusion. Some parents do not want teens to learn about sex from others. Most parents have some methods that they want to sit down and talk to their children, and other parents may want to preach smoking cessation and not have safe sex. Often, some teachers are lost from telling students that sex is progress.
    Sex begins with a kiss, then goes to kiss in France. After that, they began to touch their clothes, and the clothes came off, and the result was having sex (Speck).
Not only teaching about sex education to religion and morality of parents It also provides financial need to maintain When teaching sex education, but it also teaches students that there are products that can prevent them from having sexually transmitted diseases or are pregnant or are pregnant.
Now the teachings of quitting smoking will ensure students who want to stick to their religion and morals when it comes to the decision to say that sex is okay. But in marriage only Critics of the abstinence education program seem to have three main concerns related to abstinence education programming: promoting religion (Young and Penhallow), although this statement does not support abstinence. But still the teaching of quitting smoking will stand by belief for most people. Although most teens abstain from practicing quitting smoking, they don't want to be identified as someone who is afraid of losing. "Manhood" or "womanhood."
If we are in our morality, we should not be interested in what other people think of having sex before marriage is our choice to do.
    In addition to maintaining a religious viewpoint, quitting smoking helps students focus on the better things in life. By making a commitment to ourselves to choose to quit smoking, many teens have little chance of becoming a parent at a young age.
National Smoking Cessation Study Association Launches New Survey from Zogby International Shows that when parents are aware of what abstinence education with sex education really covers, teach the support of smoking cessation programs to jump from forty percent to sixty percent Thirty percent (Zogby survey). Lack of educating parents about what to teach in the classroom is another reason that parents promote sex education. Seventy-eight percent of parents think that sex education classes in public schools should focus on promoting smoking cessation (Zogby survey).
Teaching smoking cessation to students can make them change their thoughts about sex. Yes, there are many ways to have safe sex. But condoms do not prevent the formation of teenagers with sexually transmitted diseases. Over the past decades, many forms of sex education programs have been introduced to the country's school system. But it seems that I have not worked continuously (Quincy) since my ninth grade. Each year, every woman is pregnant. Some even became pregnant with the second child. Not because they don't care But because of lack of education The instructor can teach students all day that condoms prevent pregnancy. But if they do not teach students how to use condoms correctly, how can they expect the rate of pregnancy to drop?
    Some of these programs focus on sexually transmitted diseases and safe sex while reducing smoking cessation messages; One sure-fire way to avoid pregnancy and contractions of sexually transmitted infections. Some courses claim to combine both signals, called "Abstinence Plus," but cannot use a balanced approach, with 4.7% focusing on quitting (Martin, Rector, and Pardue, Quincy).
    Why should schools have sex education programs that promote smoking cessation? Quitting smoking helps to protect students from infections and pregnancy. Easy to maintain and doesn't need financial help. One of the last benefits of quitting smoking is the fact that we are not tied to emotions with a boy or girl. There is nothing wrong with not reading sexual life outside of marriage. It shows that you can be a leader, and you don't have to keep up with the trend of sex at a young age. You are trying to keep away from forty-seven percent high school students who have sex.
    Another safest sex is no sex. Why worry about whether you use a condom or whether she took a pill last month when you can prevent fear by keeping "it" in your pants? If you don't want a child at an early age, why risk-taking this child into the world? Don't undergo the same struggle that young parents face and don't open your body to sexually transmitted diseases. One of the biggest things, stay away from situations that will compromise your belief when you should have sex. It is part of fifty-four percent of teens in a smoking cessation program that had had sex before using the program and had no sex a year later (Quincy).
Having classes that promote smoking cessation will reduce the level of sexually transmitted diseases and teen pregnancy. Quitting smoking is the way to go because not only But will provide the safest sex services But still not a small expense

Works Cited

Johnson, Greg, and Susie Shellenberger. Sex Love and Dating. Ventura: Regal Books. Print
Speck Greg. Sex: It's Worth Waiting For. Chicago: Moody Publishers. Print.
"Parents Prefer Abstinence Education 2 to 1." Choosing the best. n.p., May 4, 2007 www.choosingthebest.com
"State Policies on sex education in Schools" NCSl. n.p. February 14, 2014
www.ncsl.org
Michael Young and Tina Penhollow. "The Impact of Abstinence Education: What Does the Research Say" American Journal of Health Education. Volume 37, NO. 4 (2006)
Michael L. Quincy. Opinion Paper. November 17, 2009

Gay Sex And Same Sex Relationships

    "No wonder that you are very stressed. Making everything together sounds like a headache and a half. "Stephanie said, shook her head, and asked with a strange expression on her face.
"Wait, isn't Lily the older sister who was anti-gay when you first came out?"
Leah confirmed that Stephanie was right, "I don't know who is the toughest mother or lily. She is the oldest, so she always feels like my mother. Remember that when I came out, I was in my second year at the graduate level and got out on my own for three years, making my own money. But for Lily, I will always be a little sister that is still worrisome. Moreover, the Jamaicans, as they are known, don't support the same sex, so I'm not surprised by how difficult it is to accept me. My sister doesn't have any problems with it. But Lily and my mother refused to acknowledge my sex, and they just insisted that I didn't find the right person. When my first girlfriend and I moved together, they refused to call home if they thought she might answer the phone. If they call her inadvertently, they will ask to speak to me and refuse to accept her. Because lilies and I had grown so much Our relationship dissolved a little when Lyra was born. But it's not the same. "
    "I'm sure you are pregnant. Have them hope that you are no longer a woman," Stephanie asked.
"I think you are right. I don't want to explain to them how Lyra gave birth. I guess they think the bank is right for depositing money, not withdrawing sperm. "
Stephanie and Leah laughed lightly. Then, Leah became severe when she returned to talk about her relationship with her sister.
"When Patricia and I really started dating the opinion She has trouble accepting the fact that I dated a twelve-year-old woman. Then, when you consider her not a Christian and fair-skinned, it is like adding fuel to the fire. We didn't speak for about six months and started working to bury the ax when my grandmother died in 2010. "
"That deep red, she has come a long way. Sure, if she makes your wedding dress."
"Frankly, she might do it because it gives her the opportunity to show off and maybe get more clients," Leah said of the truth. "For whatever reason, I'm glad she's going to be part of Patricia and Wan. My important "
    "That's good to hear. I hate when families are separated from the most straightforward problems. We can't choose the people that our family members decide to love. My point of view, as long as they respect them and treat them correctly, it doesn't matter what bathroom they use, "said Stephanie.
Sit and sip coffee. Both sat quietly for a moment. The air groaning made the office comfortable seventy-three degrees in the background. Outside, meteorologists may call for a hot day. But inside, everything is quiet and calm. They hear the phone ring. Stephanie got up to receive it. But Leah waved her hands down. The company hired them for two hours before and two hours after regular working hours. Leah felt that he could take full advantage of it.
    "I will accept, however, all this wedding planning is starting to wear me," Leah said of breaking the silence. "Now I understand that the Supreme Court has ruled gays and lesbians able to marry correctly. The law should hold a big event to remember that decision. For me, our public announcement came three years ago in Wilmington, when we had a delivery ceremony. "
"I remember you invited us to come down But that was the weekend that Paul's father had surgery, and we went to Greenville to be with him. The two of you look very cute, and I remember how much you shine when you post a picture. "
    Looking at the pictures of Patricia and her on their big day, sitting near her cellphone, Leah smiled. They look happy in the matching sunbeds. Patricia confirmed that they took pictures with the sunbeam they wore during the ceremony. Traditionally, the bride wears a face mask during the ceremony. But on that day, the weather was very hot, and they just wore a large floppy hat that protected most of their faces. In the picture, it isn't very easy to make their properties. But their loved ones are smiling without problems. It is just a small ceremony with their family, some of whom can make it down to Wilmington. They did it in the backyard of Patricia's childhood home, where her parents were still alive. There were no florists, florists, or seating charts to worry about that day. It's just two women who fell in love with the people who loved them on the first day of the fall of 2012.
Her thoughts come back to the present day. Leah says: "Since then, we were young, we decided to make it more formal because it is now legal and everything. Anyway, I stand by my beliefs just by

Sex Offenders: To Castrate or Not To Castrate

     The act of rape is considered one of the worst crimes that can happen to other people. In recent years, there has been much debate abou...